I've been
promising to write about the movie Perks of Being a Wallflower for some time
now; it seems like I've been waiting for some way to easily transition into it.
The other
day, I was sitting in a session with a weekly patient who was reporting on a
bad week. For a moment, she picked up that I had broke attunement with her.
Unfortunately, by the time I could interject that there was a tiger
swallowtail fluttering against my fourth floor office window, the butterfly was
gone.
This
sighting arrived as quite an out of the ordinary event. We do see some
butterflies in Toronto, although not nearly as many as we once did. I'd
seen a black swallowtail in our vegetable garden (I do live in the suburbs) a
few weeks before, but this was the first time this summer that I'd seen a tiger
swallowtail. I wondered what it was doing, remaining in my line of sight,
for a long, lingering moment, in this uncharacteristic location.
My
patient lost her Mom when she was young; on some level she lost her mother at
an even earlier age, because the mother of her infancy already suffered from a
serious, intermittently and progressive debilitating disease. Her
mother's symbol of hope, during her prolonged illnesses, the young woman
sitting across from me shared, with considerable emotion, was the butterfly.
From
butterfly sightings, I'm going to take you to snow angels. I'm going to
do that, because there's a scene in Perks of a Wallflower where the main
character, Charlie, feeling alienated, leaves a party and starts making snow
angels on the cold winter ground.
A few
days later, while I attended a talk on pivotal moments, Jim Duvall made mention
of one of his clients, and about their story about making their own snow angels
as a reparative and transformational act.
I'm not
going to delve into synchronicity here, or into the symbolism of butterflies
and snow angels. I like Jung and I've done my own Jungian analysis, but I
want to go somewhere else with this post.
For the
same reason, I'm not going to say a great deal about the movie. It's from
a book, written in 1999, that has sold around a million copies, and the writer,
Stephen Chbosky, had a major input into the movie. It's about kids
growing up in Pittsburgh just a little later than when I grew up, so I'm quite
familiar with the ethos and the music and culture of the time. The movie
is engaging in its human dimensions and achingly believable at times. I
enjoyed the film, which didn't try to be more than it’s meant to be, and - in
doing so - felt very true to the rites of adolescence. I should also
mention that this is a movie where we sense that Charlie may be suffering from
more than the harshness of life's passages. It becomes increasingly
likely that he is suffering from a mental illness, an inherited burden from the
past...
One of
the thematic anthems of the movie is the song Asleep by the Smiths:
This
could ostensibly be a song about suicide, and it would not be possible to
listen to it without considering this as a theme of the song. And yet, as
I experienced the song with fresh ears during the movie, I recognized that it
was also a song about hope, about dying deeply, in order to experience
transport to a better place in the living world.
So that’s
a particular thing about psychotherapy.
Some of the best therapists around have the ability to go to the edge
with their patients, to ride the torrential waves of passionate transference
and countertransference into powerful corrective experiences. It takes a great deal of natural aptitude,
and it can only happen with a very special therapist. When it does, powerful shifts may ensue, and
accelerate the healing process by months or years.
For your
interest, here’s the official trailer for the film:
It’s
worth watching the evolution of the storyline between Charlie and his English
teacher. Support and validation do not
necessarily need to be direct; sometimes an oblique approach is best. There’s a constant presence here in Charlie’s
life, and a tacit belief in his future, which supports him through his passages
of loss and loss of innocence.
One of
the fascinating phenomena of our modern time is the ability to compare our
reading experiences with those of other readers. A growing venue for this endeavour is through
the website Goodreads.
While on
Goodreads, I discovered several reader conversations on the book version of Perks.
One long thread discussed whether Charlie suffered from autism, while
another asked what kind of mental illness was at play in his life:
I was at
first surprised to see how many readers mistakenly entertained the diagnosis of
autism, even more surprised than I was at the idea that such debates could
captivate the imagination of so many book readers. I recognized the nature of diagnoses, and
their rise and fall. Where the diagnosis
of schizoid character structure was once very central in understanding mental
illness, autism and Asperger’s have very much now captured the popular
imagination. Who says that how we diagnose
and conceive of mental illness is not subject to cultural and social and
theoretical trends?
I was
pleased that enough readers correctly identified Charlie as suffering from
Complex-PTSD or Dissociative Identity Disorder.
It seems more difficult for us to accept those disorders which admit we
are susceptible to abuse and trauma.
Somehow, it’s easier to think in terms of genes and neurological
failings than it is to conceptualize mental illness in terms of responses to
overwhelming pain and intolerable levels of affect.
The movie
is clear about what’s going on here. We
are informed that Charlie was sexually abused as a child. We know he frequently checks the clock, to
see if he has lost time during dissociative episodes.
In a
powerful scene, we see structural dissociation at play, where the normally gentle
and soft-spoken Charlie comes to the defence of his best friend, who is being bullied
by a homophobic classmate. Charlie comes
to with bruised and bleeding knuckles, once his fight EP (see ANPs and EPs from earlier in the blog) has
receded and his ANP is present again.
Charlie
is finally hospitalized, at the end of the movie, where his kind and attentive
psychiatrist patiently encourages him to face his pain and his memories. She emphasizes the necessity of this, through
a soft expression of contact that conveys conviction and compassion. We know
she will, like his English teacher and his friends, go the distance with
him. This hospital is quiet, and the
environment feels nurturing and healing.
As I
watched the ending, I found myself wondering how Charlie would fare if this was
Canada, in 2014. Would he simply be
over-medicated and mis-diagnosed? Would
the message from his physicians be to avoid his pain and acquiesce to a
compromised life of numbness and under-achievement.
We talk a
big talk here about anti-stigma. Is that
our way out of having to actually treat serious conditions like Complex-PTSD
and Dissociative Identity Disorder? Is
anti-stigma really a way around abandoning the seriously wounded and betrayed members
of our society, who refuse to present with simple “mood disorders” meant to
respond to medications and short courses of manualized therapy? Do you think that Charlie (or Stephen
Chbosky, whose story it perhaps conveys) could have been treated successfully
in Canada, even in a private setting?
As you
finish reading this post, I wonder if any of you have ever found it difficult
to refer a patient with a post-traumatic or stress-based condition, or a
dissociative disorder, for definitive care?
And how
about butterfly sightings? Have you ever
had a similar moment of grace, or of finding nature in tune with an ongoing
therapy. Has some magical moment left you with a sense of the greater harmony
underlying all life.
Love the butterfly "connection"
ReplyDeleteI got too much interesting stuff on your blog. I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! Keep up the good work. counseling Parker
ReplyDelete